The Economist explains

Donald Trump says immigrants are eating Springfield’s pets. What?

He repeated the bizarre—and false—claim in his presidential debate against Kamala Harris

Former President Trump and Vice President Harris during the Presidential Debate is displayed on a TV screen
Photograph: Getty Images

WHEN DONALD TRUMP uttered the word “Springfield” 33 minutes into the American presidential debate on September 10th, David Muir, the co-moderator, was prepared. In that small Ohio town, Mr Trump declared, illegal immigrants are “eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the pets of the people who live there”. Mr Muir promptly replied that, according to Springfield’s city manager, there were no credible reports of pet-eating. The former president’s claim must have struck many viewers as bizarre. But lots of Mr Trump’s fans were primed for it: the allegation had been circulating in right-wing circles on social media, boosted by Elon Musk, the owner of X. How did the town come to be at the centre of a right-wing conspiracy theory?

Explore more

Discover more

left: Kamala Harris right: Donald Trump

How far do Kamala Harris and Donald Trump differ on policy?

A short guide to their plans for America—which are more similar than their opposing styles suggest

Starship full stack

SpaceX just tested its Starship. Why does that matter?

A guide to the reusable spaceship’s trip—and where it might lead for space travel


What is Kamala Harris’s record as a prosecutor?

Republicans say she was soft on crime. Progressives say she was too harsh


Can Donald Trump use songs against a musician’s will?

Many stars have complained, and some have filed lawsuits

What is the Fed’s preferred inflation measure?

The PCE gauge is broader and more dynamic than its better-known relative, the CPI

Will Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris matter?

Celebrity endorsements are unlikely to change voters’ minds. But they may boost turnout