Whose right to bear arms?
The Supreme Court hears a crucial case
GUN laws are a matter of life and death, reckoned both groups of protesters outside the Supreme Court on March 18th. One side argued that sensible curbs on gun ownership save lives. The other side retorted that if you outlaw guns, only criminals will carry them. Plus the police, of course, but gun-lovers don't find that terribly reassuring. “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away,” read one placard.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Whose right to bear arms?”
From the March 22nd 2008 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionDiscover more
Why Larry Hogan’s long-odds bid for a Senate seat matters
He offers conservatives a pragmatic path beyond Trumpism
Polarisation by education is remaking American politics
The battle for Pennsylvania is a test case for new coalitions of Democrats and Republicans
Checks and Balance newsletter: Partisan positions have changed drastically over the past 50 years
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump converge as much as they differ
Hurricane Milton inundates Florida
Three factors laid the ground for its destructiveness
Shirley Chisholm is still winning
The first black woman to run for president taught a lesson in making political change
US election forecast: who will control the House of Representatives?
Our prediction model assesses each party’s chance of winning the chamber