Finance & economics | Free exchange

Who bears the burden of a corporate tax?

Though aimed at shareholders, some of the costs fall on workers

JOE BIDEN wants to rebuild America, and he reckons that American firms can help foot the bill. Central to the president’s grand infrastructure-investment push is a plan to raise the tax rate on corporate income from 21% to 28% (though he has hinted he may settle for less). Although the administration pitches its tax proposals as a way to redress the problem that “those at the top are not doing their part”, opponents warn that corporate-tax rises do not simply fall on wealthy shareholders, but also shrink the pay packets of the working people the president claims to champion. In fact, workers often do bear some of the burden of increases in corporate taxes—though understanding just how much is a question that continues to vex economists. Nonetheless, the details of Mr Biden’s tax plans suggest that they may prove more worker-friendly than the usual effort to squeeze juice from Apple.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “When the Inc runs”

Ten million reasons to vaccinate the world

From the May 15th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Dark rain clouds move over the port of Hamburg, Germany

Germany’s economy goes from bad to worse

Things may look brighter next year, but the relief will be short-lived

An economics Nobel for work on why nations succeed and fail

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson tackled the most important question of all


Why investors should still avoid Chinese stocks

The debate about “uninvestibility” obscures something important


China’s property crisis claims more victims: companies

Unsold homes are contributing to a balance-sheet recession

Europe’s green trade restrictions are infuriating poor countries

Only the poorest can expect help to cushion the blow

How America learned to love tariffs

Protectionism hasn’t been this respectable for decades