Finance & economics | Free exchange

Inflation shows both the value and limits of monetary-policy rules

A search for the right equation to overcome the fallibility of human judgment

It was a curious omission. In February, when the Federal Reserve published the winter edition of its semi-annual report to Congress, it dropped a normal section outlining the appropriate level of interest rates as determined by “monetary-policy rules”. Its inclusion might have been awkward, because it would have suggested that rates should be as high as 9%, when the Fed still had them near to 0%. In subsequent hearings at least three members of Congress pressed Jerome Powell, the Fed’s chairman, to explain its absence. Mr Powell promised that the section would be back in its next report. And so it was when the summer edition was published on June 17th—though only after the Fed had started to catch up to the rules’ prescriptions by rapidly raising rates.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Disciples of discipline”

Wake up, Democrats!

From the July 16th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Dark rain clouds move over the port of Hamburg, Germany

Germany’s economy goes from bad to worse

Things may look brighter next year, but the relief will be short-lived

An economics Nobel for work on why nations succeed and fail

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson tackled the most important question of all


Why investors should still avoid Chinese stocks

The debate about “uninvestibility” obscures something important


China’s property crisis claims more victims: companies

Unsold homes are contributing to a balance-sheet recession

Europe’s green trade restrictions are infuriating poor countries

Only the poorest can expect help to cushion the blow

How America learned to love tariffs

Protectionism hasn’t been this respectable for decades